Thank you for sharing this. The “assets” element was especially interesting to me. I often see orgs forget to consider what elements of their audience can be a useful/exciting/unique offering to them.
Glad you appreciated this post, especially the section on Assets. I agree that orgs don't appreciate or celebrate what their audiences and communities can bring to strengthen the org and its offerings/programs -- they still mostly operate in a one-directional "service" model that doesn't invite in community input, involvement, participation, and creation.
Thank you for sharing this. The “assets” element was especially interesting to me. I often see orgs forget to consider what elements of their audience can be a useful/exciting/unique offering to them.
Glad you appreciated this post, especially the section on Assets. I agree that orgs don't appreciate or celebrate what their audiences and communities can bring to strengthen the org and its offerings/programs -- they still mostly operate in a one-directional "service" model that doesn't invite in community input, involvement, participation, and creation.